Review: The Secret Life of Bees (2003), Sue Monk Kidd
Posted: Thursday, April 16, 2009
by Jeff Brown
Inner Projection
I surveyed my class and 80% gave it two thumbs up: 5 stars. That's 28
out of 35 students. The rest
of the class gave it an OK: 3 or 4 stars.
So my giving it 5 stars has been backed by research into the general
public's taste. ;=)
Now, I'm not much for spending time on fiction. I don't need entertainment, I need information. But as a story teller, occasional writing class instructor, I like to keep up with some of the new fiction.
Bees is pretty good. I don't get a sense of the forced or trite here like I do in a lot of fiction. In reading most fiction, I can almost hear the writer thinking. I guess it's because I write and my intimate knowledge of the craft allows me to see a lot before it comes. Kind of like an actor who you know is just acting. But Kidd's writing is like Will Smith in Ali or Jamie Fox in Ray. In Ali there is no Smith and in Ray there is no Fox. Art works best when it's done by the talented who tap into the moment so right, so purely it stops being art and becomes real. Bees is real.
Some readers on Goodreads and Amazon had trouble with such things as the bee quotes at the start of each chapter being a bit obvious, passage of time, Zach driving around with Lilly without being accosted, the religious theme (didn't state but I'm sure it has to do with the women eating cake as the body of Mary), the triteness of a coming of age story and some of the characterization (ie: stereotypical African / American women) and so forth, but these are minor or petty problems. In the overall scheme of analysis, these issues were superficial at best.
Every story has problems simply because ONE person wrote the book. Not millions. Not you. Just the individual with the ideas, courage, focus, and discipline to do so--the author. We all come from different experiences, upbringing, religions or lack of, cultures, ages, etc. If you think you're ever going to read a book that matches perfectly with your perceptions . . . stop reading. I'm tired of people nit-picking. And most have never written a book in their lives. I also have the same problem with people (90%) who don't have ANY IDEA WHATSOEVER what it's like to have a public life who are hypercritical. One of the secrets to the successful is an open mind. Too many closed one's out there. Sorry, tirade. Back to the book.
Bottom line, I was impressed and I've read a lot of stories and written many myself. I know the difficulties involved in making a story work, making is real, and connecting to readers. This book does all that and more. And that's where we focus as readers looking for something human, something humane to enliven and enlighten our lives.
Now, I'm not much for spending time on fiction. I don't need entertainment, I need information. But as a story teller, occasional writing class instructor, I like to keep up with some of the new fiction.
Bees is pretty good. I don't get a sense of the forced or trite here like I do in a lot of fiction. In reading most fiction, I can almost hear the writer thinking. I guess it's because I write and my intimate knowledge of the craft allows me to see a lot before it comes. Kind of like an actor who you know is just acting. But Kidd's writing is like Will Smith in Ali or Jamie Fox in Ray. In Ali there is no Smith and in Ray there is no Fox. Art works best when it's done by the talented who tap into the moment so right, so purely it stops being art and becomes real. Bees is real.
Some readers on Goodreads and Amazon had trouble with such things as the bee quotes at the start of each chapter being a bit obvious, passage of time, Zach driving around with Lilly without being accosted, the religious theme (didn't state but I'm sure it has to do with the women eating cake as the body of Mary), the triteness of a coming of age story and some of the characterization (ie: stereotypical African / American women) and so forth, but these are minor or petty problems. In the overall scheme of analysis, these issues were superficial at best.
Every story has problems simply because ONE person wrote the book. Not millions. Not you. Just the individual with the ideas, courage, focus, and discipline to do so--the author. We all come from different experiences, upbringing, religions or lack of, cultures, ages, etc. If you think you're ever going to read a book that matches perfectly with your perceptions . . . stop reading. I'm tired of people nit-picking. And most have never written a book in their lives. I also have the same problem with people (90%) who don't have ANY IDEA WHATSOEVER what it's like to have a public life who are hypercritical. One of the secrets to the successful is an open mind. Too many closed one's out there. Sorry, tirade. Back to the book.
Bottom line, I was impressed and I've read a lot of stories and written many myself. I know the difficulties involved in making a story work, making is real, and connecting to readers. This book does all that and more. And that's where we focus as readers looking for something human, something humane to enliven and enlighten our lives.
This Article has been viewed 132 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
No comments yet.We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.